Content Area |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Accept -able |
Good |
Excell-ent |
Not Appli
-cable |
Subjects |
1. Is selection of subjects appropriate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the presented subject researchable? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is the research subject new and creative? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Introduction |
1. Is the significance of the study stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are the subjects and purpose of the study specific and clear? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Are the relationships between major concepts and previous investigations logically stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Methods |
Instrument |
1. Is the instrument valid? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the instrument reliable? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Subjects |
3. Is the subject appropriate for the purpose of the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Is the sampling appropriate for the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Is the rational for the sample size mentioned? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Data Collection & Data Analysis |
6. Is the ethical consideration during the process stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Is the data collection procedure appropriate for the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Is the data analysis appropriate for the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
1. Is the statistics concisely stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are interpretations consistent with the results? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
1. Is the discussion based on the results? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Does the author separately state results and interpretations of the researcher? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is the discussion clearly and logically stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Does the author sufficiently review the relationship between results and previous investigations? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions & Suggestions |
1. Are the summary and conclusion properly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Do the results contribute to practice, research, education and policy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA format? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: _________________________ Reviewer:_____________ Signature:_____________________
(Qualitative Study)
Title: _________________________________________________________________
Content Area |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Accept -able |
Good |
Excell-ent |
Research Questions |
1. Is the research process clearly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is significance of research problems provided? |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Are questions specific and interview questions proper? |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Is the choice of research method consistent with the questions? |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Is the philosophical point of view about research method presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
Data collection & Analysis
|
1.Are the training and preparation to exclude the bias of researcher stated adequately? |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is data collection procedure (e.g.: interview, observation etc. ) appropriate? |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is the sampling procedure specifically stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
4. Is the ethical consideration during the process stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
5. Are all processes of data analysis properly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
6. Is the process of data collection and analysis interacted? |
|
|
|
|
|
7.Are other researcher's critique and participants' identification included? |
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
1. Do interpretations of the data answer to the research questions? |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are the results clearly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
Discussion |
1. Is the discussion about the identified phenomenon properly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
2. 2. Does the author provide the implications (research, e education, and practice) of the results? |
|
|
|
|
|
3. Does the author suggest the direction of the following research? |
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions |
1. Is the conclusion properly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA format? |
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
Content Area |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Accept -able |
Good |
Excell-ent |
Not Appli
-cable |
Theme |
1. Is the selection of themes appropriate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are the questions of the study new and creative? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significance & Purpose |
1. Are the research questions and the purpose of the study specific and clear? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Literature Review |
1. Does the review include major concepts related to the research ? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are the primary sources mainly used? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Are current literatures used? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Does the review include the critical analysis of
the researcher? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results & Discussion |
1. Are interpretations and discussion of the findings appropriate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions & Suggestions |
1. Are the summary and conclusion properly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Do the results contribute to practice, research, education and policy? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Do conclusions contribute to improvement of professionality in subject areas of the research? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA format? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Date: _________________________ Reviewer:_____________ Signature
____________________
(Concept Analysis)
Title: _________________________________________________________________
Guideline of Review
Content Area |
Very
Poor |
Poor |
Accept -able |
Good |
Excell-ent |
Not Appli
-cable |
Subjects |
1. Is selection of research subject appropriate for the purpose of concept analysis? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Are researchable concepts presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Significance & Purpose |
1. Is the necessity of concept analysis logically developed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the selection of concept analysis method appropriate? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is the purpose of the study consistent with concept analysis method? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Literature Review |
1. Are the literatures from all the disciplines for which concepts are used reviewed conductively? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the comparative analysis on attributes and definitions of research concepts provided? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is a working definition of the research concept presented (hybrid model)? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Field Works
(Hybrid Model) |
1. Does the research consider the analytic units that are appropriate for the level of research concept? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the subject appropriate for the analytic unit? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Is the researcher's training and preparation sufficiently described? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
4. Is the ethical consideration during the process stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
5. Does the author use appropriate questions to define attributes? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
6. Is the data collection procedure appropriate for the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
7. Is the process of data collection and analysis interactive? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
8. Is the validity of the analytic results confirmed? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
9. Are attributes and definitions of concepts which are identified by field works presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Results |
1. Is the comprehensive analysis of attributes and definitions of research concepts presented? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Does the author present a model case, antecedents, consequences, and empirical referents of research concept? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Conclusions & Suggestions |
1. Is the conclusion properly stated? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2.Does the author provide the implications (research, education, practice) of the results? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. Does the author suggest the directions of the following research? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Others |
1. Is the reference list prepared according to APA format? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. Is the abstract of the study concisely reflective of the study? |
|
|
|
|
|
|
Welcome Message 
